Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
Participate
Maplehurst Park — site photograph
Back to map
Urban Plazacluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (enclosure-leaning)Willowdale East (51)confidence moderatereal Toronto data

Maplehurst Park

Urban Plaza, middle of the pack overall (score 39, rank ~70th percentile). Strongest: amenity diversity; weakest: edge activation.

Aerial — City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px source · cached 5/9/2026

Maplehurst Park scores 38.7 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and connectivity. Weakest: edge activation (0). Border-vacuum risk is low. This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors — not a definitive judgment.

Best for:daily passing-throughpocket meetings

Area · 0.46 ha

Vitality Score
39/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 72%

Data Confidence
38.7 / 100
Citywide
70th
of all 3,273 parks
Among Urban Plaza
59th
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
39
median in small Urban Plaza (n=100)
Performance gap
-0
raw − expected · context confidence high
typical

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Explain this score

Where did the 39 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Edge Activation0 · p37
-12.5
Amenity Diversity12 · p77
-7.6
Border Vacuum Risk0 (risk)
+5.0
Enclosure / Eyes on Park75 · p77
+2.5
Connectivity59 · p72
+1.8
Natural Comfort47 · p53
-0.5

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

Maplehurst Park works because its amenity diversity score (12) is above average and its enclosure (75) is also top quartile.

What limits this park

Maplehurst Park doesn't have a clear weakness — every measured dimension is at or above the middle of the pack.

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high amenity diversity (12, top quartile).

Jacobs reading

Maplehurst Park sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat — moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.

Tradeoffs

  • The park is enclosed by buildings (75) but the surrounding streets are quiet (edge activation 0) — frame without animation.

Typology classification

confidence 70%
Urban Plaza

Classified as Urban Plaza: 4617 m², paved (9% canopy), 18.6 buildings/100 m

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
0.0 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 3 active uses (restaurant, retail) and 6 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
59.2 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 7 mapped paths/walkways and 7 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 5 street intersections within 100 m; 10 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 4 estimated access points across ~361 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy — no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m10
Intersections within 100 m5
Paths/walkways (50 m)7
Sidewalk segments (50 m)7
Transit stops (400 m)10
Estimated entrances4
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter2.77
Park perimeter361 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightmeasured 75%
11.9 / 100

1 distinct amenity types in the park (playground). Diversity, not raw count, drives the score so a park with many distinct activity types can outrank a larger park that repeats the same use.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightmeasured 75%
46.6 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: 9.1% estimated tree canopy; nearest waterbody ~1142 m; 5 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (5.0/ha). Reading: exposed. Source coverage: treed_area, waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage9.1%
Canopy area0.04 ha
Inside ravine system0.0%
Water surface inside park0.0%
Nearest water (if outside park)1,142 m
Estimated green100.0%
City-mapped trees inside polygon5
Tree density5.0 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0–100)43.9
Sample points used33

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
75.3 / 100

67 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (5 mid-rise, 62 low-rise, 0 tower); avg edge height 6.7 m (~2 floors); 18.6 buildings per 100 m of 361 m perimeter — strong frontage density; edges are low-rise (mostly 2–3 floors); no towers immediately adjacent. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 5 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m67
Buildings within 50 m67
Avg edge height6.7 m (~2 floors)
Tallest edge building10.8 m
Mid-rise (3–7 floors)5
Low-rise (< 3 floors)62
Towers (≥ 13 floors)0
Frontage density18.55 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge8%
Tower share of edge0%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter361 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
0.0 risk

Park edges face the city — no significant border vacuum detected.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence — read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (1 types · 1 records)

  • playground

Nearby active-edge features (57)

  • parking lot53 m
  • parking lot70 m
  • parking lot75 m
  • parking lot84 m
  • restaurant — Shamshiri Restaurant87 m
  • parking lot87 m
  • retail — Global Pet Foods88 m
  • retail — Good Time Wellness91 m
  • parking lot99 m
  • parking lot116 m
  • retail — Bayview Kitchen Design119 m
  • retail — Just Drums119 m
  • parking lot120 m
  • parking lot130 m
  • parking lot131 m
  • parking lot131 m
  • retail — Strong Automotive135 m
  • retail — Art Restoration inc.137 m
  • retail — Daisy Mart138 m
  • transit stop — Willowdale Ave at Sheppard Ave E142 m
  • retail — Rona Lansing143 m
  • retail — Splendid Nails ltd.145 m
  • restaurant — Domino's146 m
  • restaurant — Popeyes149 m
  • restaurant — Wimpy's149 m
  • transit stop — Willowdale Avenue149 m
  • parking lot150 m
  • retail — Master's Cleaners152 m
  • restaurant — Vietnoms153 m
  • retail — Floralux156 m
  • retail157 m
  • restaurant — Michi Sushi157 m
  • transit stop — Spring Garden Avenue159 m
  • restaurant — Paisano's159 m
  • restaurant — Subway159 m
  • retail — Ava Esfahan Food Market159 m
  • transit stop — Willowdale Ave at Sheppard Ave E160 m
  • retail — Marmion Medspa160 m
  • retail — Reprodux161 m
  • restaurant — So Hungry162 m
  • restaurant — Gangnam Sushi164 m
  • retail — Buy N Cell166 m
  • retail — Sherwin-Williams166 m
  • parking lot167 m
  • restaurant — Spring Chicken House167 m
  • restaurant — Chicken Place167 m
  • parking lot170 m
  • retail — Sheppard Wine Works171 m
  • cafe — Tim Hortons176 m
  • parking lot178 m
  • retail — Willowdale Cleaner179 m
  • parking lot185 m
  • parking lot185 m
  • parking lot186 m
  • transit stop — Spring Garden Avenue189 m
  • transit stop — Willowdale Avenue194 m
  • restaurant195 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureMaplehurst Park

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    70th
  • Edge activation
    37th
  • Connectivity
    72th
  • Amenity diversity
    77th
  • Natural comfort
    53th
  • Enclosure
    77th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space — useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Human activity signals — not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of Maplehurst Parkmatters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter — and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all · 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only — no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions — a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park — playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden — even small additions raise this score.
  • Increase canopy and reduce paved area. Shade and water features extend usable hours and seasons.

Data sources

  • City of Toronto Open Data — Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.