Skip to content
Toronto Park Atlas
Yorkdale Park — site photograph
Back to map
Parkettecluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (ravine-leaning)Yorkdale-Glen Park (31)confidence moderatereal Toronto data

Yorkdale Park

Parkette, middle of the pack overall (score 37, rank ~62th percentile). Strongest: connectivity; weakest: amenity diversity.

Aerial — City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px source · cached 5/9/2026

Yorkdale Park scores 36.7 / 100. Strongest dimensions: connectivity and enclosure / eyes on park. Weakest: amenity diversity (0). Border-vacuum risk is elevated (60). This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors — not a definitive judgment.

Best for:a quiet siteveryday neighbourhood use

Area · 0.86 ha

Vitality Score
37/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 61%

Data Confidence
36.7 / 100
Citywide
62nd
of all 3,273 parks
Among Parkette
69th
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
36
median in small Parkette (n=218)
Performance gap
+1
raw − expected · context confidence high
typical

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Explain this score

Where did the 37 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Edge Activation5 · p65
-11.3
Amenity Diversity0 · p50
-10.0
Connectivity74 · p95
+4.8
Enclosure / Eyes on Park71 · p71
+2.1
Natural Comfort64 · p78
+2.0
Border Vacuum Risk60 (risk)
-1.0

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

Yorkdale Park works because its connectivity score (74) is in the top tier and its natural comfort (64) is also top quartile (27 transit stops sit within a 400 m walk; 11 intersections fall within 100 m of the edge).

What limits this park

Yorkdale Park's edges are fronted by border-vacuum land uses (highways, rail, parking, blank institutional) — risk score 60.

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high connectivity (74, top decile).

Jacobs reading

Yorkdale Park sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat — moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.

Tradeoffs

  • The park is enclosed by buildings (71) but the surrounding streets are quiet (edge activation 5) — frame without animation.
  • High connectivity coexists with high border-vacuum risk (60) — much of that connectivity is to highways, rail, or parking lots, not to neighbourhoods.

Typology classification

confidence 70%
Parkette

Classified as Parkette: small (8630 m²) with strong building frontage (7.0 per 100 m)

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
5.0 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 34 active uses (retail, transit_stop, cafe, community) and 10 dead/hostile uses (highway, rail, parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
74.0 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 8 mapped paths/walkways and 22 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 11 street intersections within 100 m; 27 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 7 estimated access points across ~441 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy — no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m8
Intersections within 100 m11
Paths/walkways (50 m)8
Sidewalk segments (50 m)22
Transit stops (400 m)27
Estimated entrances7
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter1.81
Park perimeter441 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightinferred 30%
0.0 / 100

No amenities recorded — score is 0 until inventory is loaded.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightpartial 60%
63.6 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: 29.5% estimated tree canopy; 23 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (23.0/ha). Reading: partially shaded. Source coverage: treed_area, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage29.5%
Canopy area0.25 ha
Inside ravine system0.0%
Water surface inside park0.0%
Nearest water (if outside park)1,500 m
Estimated green100.0%
City-mapped trees inside polygon23
Tree density23.0 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0–100)87.5
Sample points used61

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
71.4 / 100

31 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (4 mid-rise, 27 low-rise, 0 tower); avg edge height 7.7 m (~3 floors); 7.0 buildings per 100 m of 441 m perimeter — strong frontage density; edges are low-rise (mostly 2–3 floors); no towers immediately adjacent. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 4 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m31
Buildings within 50 m31
Avg edge height7.7 m (~3 floors)
Tallest edge building39.7 m
Mid-rise (3–7 floors)4
Low-rise (< 3 floors)27
Towers (≥ 13 floors)0
Frontage density7.03 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge13%
Tower share of edge0%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter441 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
60.0 risk

Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: Allen Road, Line 1 Yonge-University, parking_lot. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" — they suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence — read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (0)

No amenities recorded for this park.

Nearby active-edge features (80)

  • transit stop — Ranee Avenue at Flemington Rd7 m
  • transit stop — Flemington Rd at Ranee Avenue31 m
  • transit stop31 m
  • transit stop31 m
  • highway — Allen Road33 m
  • transit stop37 m
  • community — North York Community House37 m
  • parking lot42 m
  • retail43 m
  • rail — Line 1 Yonge-University43 m
  • transit stop — Ranee Avenue North44 m
  • transit stop46 m
  • transit stop — Yorkdale47 m
  • transit stop48 m
  • highway — Allen Road51 m
  • transit stop53 m
  • rail — Line 1 Yonge-University53 m
  • highway — Allen Road55 m
  • transit stop — Flemington Rd at Ranee Avenue57 m
  • transit stop57 m
  • transit stop — Yorkdale59 m
  • rail — Line 1 Yonge-University63 m
  • transit stop63 m
  • retail — MobileCare63 m
  • cafe — Chatime64 m
  • cafe — Tim Hortons65 m
  • retail — Stitch It66 m
  • retail68 m
  • transit stop70 m
  • rail — Line 1 Yonge-University71 m
  • retail — Best Buy Express71 m
  • retail — Arc'teryx74 m
  • transit stop78 m
  • highway — Allen Road79 m
  • transit stop80 m
  • retail — LensCrafters83 m
  • highway — Allen Road87 m
  • retail — Lisa Gozlan89 m
  • cafe — Starbucks93 m
  • transit stop93 m
  • transit stop — Ranee Avenue South93 m
  • retail — Sunglass Hut93 m
  • retail — WirelessWave95 m
  • retail — Foot Locker98 m
  • retail — Trade Secrets101 m
  • retail — Roots103 m
  • highway — Allen Road104 m
  • transit stop — Yorkdale Mall104 m
  • parking lot104 m
  • retail — GameStop106 m
  • retail — Koodo108 m
  • parking lot112 m
  • retail — Fido112 m
  • retail — Lucid Motors114 m
  • retail — Rivian117 m
  • retail — Freedom Mobile117 m
  • rail — Line 1 Yonge-University118 m
  • parking lot119 m
  • retail — Canada Goose120 m
  • rail — Line 1 Yonge-University124 m
  • retail — Samsung125 m
  • highway — Allen Road125 m
  • retail — Dyson126 m
  • retail — Ray-Ban128 m
  • transit stop — Ranee Avenue at Varna Dr128 m
  • highway — Allen Road132 m
  • retail — Moose Knuckles134 m
  • retail — Alexandre Mattiusi137 m
  • retail — COS139 m
  • transit stop — Yorkdale Road at GO Terminal140 m
  • retail — Gentle Monster147 m
  • retail — Zippy Market152 m
  • retail — Marc Jacobs155 m
  • retail — Lululemon156 m
  • retail — October’s Very Own158 m
  • transit stop — Ranee Avenue at Varna Dr159 m
  • retail — Annie Bing159 m
  • retail — Diptyque'160 m
  • retail — Aesop162 m
  • retail — Acne Studios164 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureYorkdale Park

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    62th
  • Edge activation
    65th
  • Connectivity
    95th
  • Amenity diversity
    50th
  • Natural comfort
    78th
  • Enclosure
    71th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space — useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Human activity signals — not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of Yorkdale Parkmatters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter — and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all · 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only — no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions — a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park — playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden — even small additions raise this score.
  • Mitigate border vacuums (highways, rail, parking) with active programming on the still-permeable edges and treat the hostile edge as a design challenge.

Data sources

  • City of Toronto Open Data — Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.