Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
GIBSON HOUSE - Building Grounds — site photograph
Back to map
Tower-Community Green Spacecluster ·Underperforming / Leftover Spaces (enclosure-leaning)Willowdale West (37)confidence moderatereal Toronto data

GIBSON HOUSE - Building Grounds

Tower-Community Green Space, middle of the pack overall (score 31, rank ~35th percentile). Strongest: edge activation; weakest: natural comfort.

Aerial — City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px source · cached 5/9/2026

GIBSON HOUSE - Building Grounds scores 31 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and connectivity. Weakest: amenity diversity (0). Border-vacuum risk is low. This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors — not a definitive judgment.

Best for:nearby residentstower-block recreation

Area · 0.02 ha

Vitality Score
31/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 56%

Data Confidence
31.0 / 100
Citywide
35th
of all 3,273 parks
Among Tower-Community Green Space
43rd
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
32
median in pocket Tower-Community Green Space (n=17)
Performance gap
-1
raw − expected · context confidence medium
typical

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Explain this score

Where did the 31 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Amenity Diversity0 · p2
-10.0
Edge Activation24 · p79
-6.5
Border Vacuum Risk0 (risk)
+5.0
Connectivity26 · p15
-4.8
Natural Comfort23 · p1
-4.1
Enclosure / Eyes on Park64 · p53
+1.4

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

GIBSON HOUSE - Building Grounds works because its edge activation score (24) is above average.

What limits this park

GIBSON HOUSE - Building Grounds is held back by natural comfort (23, bottom quartile)— only 0% canopy means little summer shade.

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally low natural comfort (23, bottom quartile).

Jacobs reading

GIBSON HOUSE - Building Grounds is currently underperforming on both axes — neither integrated into the city nor offering deep natural respite. A candidate for design intervention.

Tradeoffs

  • The park is enclosed by buildings (64) but the surrounding streets are quiet (edge activation 24) — frame without animation.
  • 27 nearby towers cast wind and shadow without contributing canopy — passive surveillance is plentiful but human-scale comfort is not.

Typology classification

confidence 75%
Tower-Community Green Spacealso reads as Civic Square

Classified as Tower-Community Green Space: 27 towers vs 10 mid-rise within 25 m on a 0.0 ha park. Secondary read: Civic Square (tower-walled, low canopy (0%), tight frontage — reads as a civic square).

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
24.0 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 4 active uses (cafe, restaurant, retail) and 2 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
25.8 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 1 mapped paths/walkways and 1 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 3 street intersections within 100 m; 12 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 0 estimated access points across ~58 m of perimeter. low edge density — significant superblock penalty applied. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m0
Intersections within 100 m3
Paths/walkways (50 m)1
Sidewalk segments (50 m)1
Transit stops (400 m)12
Estimated entrances0
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter0.00
Park perimeter58 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightinferred 30%
0.0 / 100

No amenities recorded — score is 0 until inventory is loaded.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightinferred 24%
23.0 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: 0.0% estimated tree canopy; nearest waterbody ~1161 m. Reading: exposed. Source coverage: waterbodies. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage0.0%
Canopy area0.00 ha
Inside ravine system0.0%
Water surface inside park0.0%
Nearest water (if outside park)1,161 m
Estimated green100.0%
City-mapped trees inside polygon0
Tree density0.0 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0–100)0.0
Sample points used5

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
63.9 / 100

40 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (10 mid-rise, 3 low-rise, 27 tower); avg edge height 88.3 m (~29 floors); 40.0 buildings per 100 m of 58 m perimeter — strong frontage density; edges dominated by towers; 27 towers ≥ 40 m within 25 m of the edge. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 10 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m40
Buildings within 50 m40
Avg edge height88.3 m (~29 floors)
Tallest edge building144.3 m
Mid-rise (3–7 floors)10
Low-rise (< 3 floors)3
Towers (≥ 13 floors)27
Frontage density40.00 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge25%
Tower share of edge68%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter58 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
0.0 risk

Park edges face the city — no significant border vacuum detected.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence — read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (0)

No amenities recorded for this park.

Nearby active-edge features (63)

  • retail — Taya69 m
  • parking lot70 m
  • cafe — Aroma Espresso Bar79 m
  • parking lot82 m
  • restaurant — Boston Pizza82 m
  • retail — Pet Valu97 m
  • highway — Yonge Street102 m
  • retail — Lucullus106 m
  • parking lot112 m
  • restaurant — Trio 3114 m
  • transit stop — Yonge Street at Park Home Avenue116 m
  • highway — Yonge Street119 m
  • highway — Yonge Street120 m
  • retail — Tavazo Dried Nuts & Fruits126 m
  • cafe — A Corner Cafe126 m
  • retail — North York Ink133 m
  • cafe — ITS TEA134 m
  • retail — Geneva Fine Jewellery & Watches135 m
  • restaurant — Good Taste Casserole Rice136 m
  • retail — Quattro Boutique137 m
  • retail — Jazz Casuals138 m
  • retail — Elysia Beauty Bar139 m
  • restaurant — Daldongnae Korean BBQ139 m
  • retail — Hermosa Medical Esthetics139 m
  • retail — Fido140 m
  • parking lot143 m
  • retail144 m
  • cafe — Centre Cafe145 m
  • retail — City Centre Convenience150 m
  • parking lot152 m
  • retail — Pixel Ink Tattoo153 m
  • cafe — Second Cup154 m
  • retail — Midnight Sun Tanning Salon154 m
  • restaurant — La Prep155 m
  • parking lot156 m
  • retail — Centrestage Hair Design & Beauty Products156 m
  • restaurant — Cafe Palma156 m
  • parking lot158 m
  • transit stop — North York City Centre Entrance158 m
  • retail — La Memoire159 m
  • restaurant — Villa Fruit159 m
  • transit stop — Yonge Street at Empress Avenue161 m
  • retail — PetSmart168 m
  • restaurant — Evivva Restaurant Breakfast & Lunch170 m
  • restaurant — California Thai170 m
  • restaurant — Morals Village172 m
  • highway — Yonge Street175 m
  • retail — Palm Tree176 m
  • retail — Flight Centre177 m
  • parking lot179 m
  • parking lot180 m
  • parking lot181 m
  • cafe — Ten Ren's Tea181 m
  • parking lot181 m
  • restaurant — Subway184 m
  • parking lot185 m
  • restaurant — Ajisen Ramen188 m
  • community — Toronto Public Library - North York Central Library189 m
  • transit stop — North York Centre190 m
  • parking lot192 m
  • school — Shining Through Centre193 m
  • transit stop — North York Centre193 m
  • retail — LCBO199 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureGIBSON HOUSE - Building Grounds

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    35th
  • Edge activation
    79th
  • Connectivity
    15th
  • Amenity diversity
    2th
  • Natural comfort
    1th
  • Enclosure
    53th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space — useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Human activity signals — not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of GIBSON HOUSE - Building Groundsmatters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter — and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all · 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only — no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions — a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
  • Add or open more entrances and improve sidewalk continuity around the park. More permeability means more spontaneous use.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park — playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden — even small additions raise this score.
  • Increase canopy and reduce paved area. Shade and water features extend usable hours and seasons.

Data sources

  • City of Toronto Open Data — Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.