Othercluster ·Underperforming / Leftover Spaces (ravine-leaning)Islington-City Centre West (14)confidence moderatereal Toronto data

Etobicoke Hydro Green Space

Other, below average overall (score 30, rank ~29th percentile). Strongest: edge activation; weakest: enclosure.

Aerial — City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px source · cached 5/9/2026

Etobicoke Hydro Green Space scores 29.7 / 100. Strongest dimensions: connectivity and edge activation. Weakest: amenity diversity (0). Border-vacuum risk is low. This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors — not a definitive judgment.

Best for:varies — see metrics

Area · 0.41 ha

Vitality Score

30/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 55%

Data Confidence

29.7 / 100

Citywide

29th

of all 3,273 parks

Among Other

71st

same primary typology

Expected for similar parks

median in small Other (n=41)

Performance gap

raw − expected · context confidence high

modest overperformer

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Explain this score

Where did the 30 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON

What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score

Amenity Diversity0 · p27

-10.0

Edge Activation28 · p86

-5.4

Natural Comfort24 · p4

-3.9

Border Vacuum Risk12 (risk)

+3.8

Connectivity37 · p30

-2.6

Enclosure / Eyes on Park28 · p3

-2.2

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

Etobicoke Hydro Green Space works because its edge activation score (28) is in the top tier.

What limits this park

Etobicoke Hydro Green Space is held back by enclosure (28, bottom quartile)— no mid-rise frontage to provide eyes on the park.

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally low enclosure (28, bottom quartile).

Jacobs reading

Etobicoke Hydro Green Space is currently underperforming on both axes — neither integrated into the city nor offering deep natural respite. A candidate for design intervention.

Performance in context

A modest overperformer for its other typology (+6 vs the median in small Other).
Although its citywide rank is low (29th), it ranks highly among similar others (71st) — strong for what it is, even if the absolute score is moderate.

Typology classification

confidence 30%

Other

Classified as Other: does not meet any specific typology threshold (0.4 ha, 0 amenity types, frontage 0.7/100m)

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%

28.4 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 13 active uses (retail, transit_stop, restaurant) and 5 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%

37.1 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 0 mapped paths/walkways and 8 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 1 street intersections within 100 m; 8 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 0 estimated access points across ~305 m of perimeter. moderate edge density — small superblock penalty applied. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m2

Intersections within 100 m1

Paths/walkways (50 m)0

Sidewalk segments (50 m)8

Transit stops (400 m)8

Estimated entrances0

Edge connections / 100 m perimeter0.66

Park perimeter305 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightinferred 30%

0.0 / 100

No amenities recorded — score is 0 until inventory is loaded.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightinferred 30%

24.1 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: 0.0% estimated tree canopy; nearest waterbody ~787 m. Reading: exposed. Source coverage: waterbodies. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage0.0%

Canopy area0.00 ha

Inside ravine system0.0%

Water surface inside park0.0%

Nearest water (if outside park)787 m

Estimated green100.0%

City-mapped trees inside polygon0

Tree density0.0 / ha

Cover diversity (Shannon, 0–100)0.0

Sample points used30

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightpartial 60%

27.7 / 100

2 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (0 mid-rise, 2 low-rise, 0 tower); avg edge height 3.9 m (~1 floors); 0.7 buildings per 100 m of 305 m perimeter — thin frontage — significant blank-edge share; edges are barely there or single-storey; no towers immediately adjacent. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 0 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m2

Buildings within 50 m2

Avg edge height3.9 m (~1 floors)

Tallest edge building6.0 m

Mid-rise (3–7 floors)0

Low-rise (< 3 floors)2

Towers (≥ 13 floors)0

Frontage density0.66 per 100 m perimeter

Mid-rise share of edge0%

Tower share of edge0%

Blank-edge share (proxy)78%

Park perimeter305 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%

12.0 risk

Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: parking_lot. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" — they suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%

50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence — read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (0)

No amenities recorded for this park.

Nearby active-edge features (58)

parking lot5 m
restaurant — Mr. Souvlaki30 m
retail — Nice One Nails38 m
retail — Nothing Bundt Cakes47 m
restaurant — BarBurrito49 m
restaurant — Firehouse Subs49 m
retail — Blo Blow Dry Bar49 m
retail — Sleep Country50 m
transit stop — Index Road53 m
restaurant — Five Guys57 m
parking lot57 m
parking lot60 m
retail — Veg ER for Pets74 m
transit stop — North Queen St at Manstor Rd89 m
parking lot90 m
retail — Paris Baguette90 m
retail — Mark's96 m
parking lot98 m
restaurant — Freshii106 m
retail — Beauty Supply Outlet106 m
retail — Snuggle Bugz106 m
retail — Soft Moc Shoe Rack106 m
retail — Sport Chek106 m
restaurant — Vivo106 m
restaurant — Sunset Grill107 m
restaurant — Nando's108 m
retail — Michaels109 m
retail — Party City110 m
retail — Structube110 m
transit stop — Index Road111 m
retail — Skechers111 m
parking lot118 m
retail — Picasso Medi and Nails Spa122 m
retail — DSW123 m
parking lot124 m
retail — Canadian Appliance Source125 m
retail — Marshalls133 m
retail — Fika Local Cannabis135 m
retail — My Top Drawer137 m
retail — Canna Cabana142 m
transit stop — North Queen St at Manstor Rd158 m
retail — Penningtons159 m
retail — PetSmart161 m
parking lot166 m
retail — Memory Express168 m
highway — Highway 427 Collector170 m
retail — Tip Top Tailors176 m
rail — Galt Subdivision181 m
retail — Vision Centre at Walmart184 m
retail — Dollarama184 m
rail — Galt Subdivision185 m
highway — Highway 427 Express189 m
rail — Galt Subdivision189 m
highway — Highway 427 Collector190 m
restaurant — McDonald's191 m
retail — Laura192 m
retail — Tail Blazers193 m
highway — Highway 427 Express197 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

Overall vitality
29th
Edge activation
86th
Connectivity
30th
Amenity diversity
27th
Natural comfort
4th
Enclosure
3th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Etobicoke Hydro Green SpaceOther30
City Wide Open SpaceRavine / Naturalized Park32
City Wide Open SpaceWaterfront Park34
MORNINGSIDE YARD - Building GroundsNeighbourhood Park35
Downsview Subway Station GreenOther28

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space — useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

High ParkRavine / Naturalized Park47
Kew GardensNeighbourhood Park71
Ramsden ParkRavine / Naturalized Park43
Trinity Bellwoods ParkNeighbourhood Park63
Sir Winston Churchill ParkRavine / Naturalized Park69

Human activity signals — not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of Etobicoke Hydro Green Spacematters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter — and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions — a starting point, not a prescription.

Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
Add or open more entrances and improve sidewalk continuity around the park. More permeability means more spontaneous use.
Diversify what people can do in the park — playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden — even small additions raise this score.
Increase canopy and reduce paved area. Shade and water features extend usable hours and seasons.
Encourage mid-rise, windowed frontages around the park so residents have direct sightlines onto it.

Data sources

City of Toronto Open Data — Parks (Green Space)
Polygon boundaries, official names, types.
Parks & Recreation Facilities
Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
Toronto Pedestrian Network
Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
Toronto Centreline V2
Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
Toronto 3D Massing
Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
Toronto Treed Area
Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
Toronto Street Tree Inventory
Tree count + density inside park polygons.
Neighbourhood Profiles
(Pending) Equity context proxy.
OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.