Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
West Deane Park, site photograph
Back to map
Ravine / Naturalized Parkcluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (large-scale)Eringate-Centennial-West Deane (11)confidence moderate

West Deane Park

Ravine / Naturalized Park, above average overall (score 44, rank ~85th percentile). Strongest: connectivity; weakest: edge activation.

Photo by True Adventure via Google Places · cached 5/9/2026

West Deane Park scores 44.3 / 100. Strongest dimensions: connectivity and natural comfort. Weakest: edge activation (0). Border-vacuum risk is elevated (78). This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.

Best forescape into nature

Area · 54.09 ha

What's here

Recreation
PlaygroundSports fieldTennisPoolTable tennis
Facilities
WashroomPicnic areaShelterBenches
Vitality Score
44/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 72%

Data Confidence
44.3 / 100
Citywide
85th
of all 3,788 parks
Among Ravine / Naturalized Park
89th
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
38
median in very large Ravine / Naturalized Park ravine (n=36)
Performance gap
+6
raw − expected · context confidence high
modest overperformer

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Loading map…

The parks map is loading.
Street context. Park polygon highlighted on the citywide map. Connectivity, transit, and edge conditions read at a glance.
West Deane Park, aerial top-down view
Top-down view.City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px. Reads the park’s footprint, paths, treed area, and edge conditions from above. City of Toronto Orthophoto · cot_ortho most-current MapServer · cached 5/9/2026.

Boundary: OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).

Explain this score

Where did the 44 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Edge Activation0 · p31
-12.5
Connectivity79 · p98
+5.7
Border Vacuum Risk78 (risk)
-2.8
Natural Comfort67 · p83
+2.6
Enclosure / Eyes on Park60 · p38
+1.0
Amenity Diversity52 · p98
+0.4

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

West Deane Park works because its connectivity score (79) is one of the city's strongest and its amenity diversity (52) is also top decile (26 transit stops sit within a 400 m walk; 52 intersections fall within 100 m of the edge).

What limits this park

West Deane Park is held back by edge activation (0, below-average): the surrounding streets carry too few active uses to spill into the park; border-vacuum risk is also elevated (78).

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high connectivity (79, top decile).

Jacobs reading

West Deane Park sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat: moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.

Tradeoffs

  • High connectivity coexists with high border-vacuum risk (78): much of that connectivity is to highways, rail, or parking lots, not to neighbourhoods.

Performance in context

  • A modest overperformer for its ravine / naturalized park typology (+6 vs the median in very large Ravine / Naturalized Park ravine).

Typology classification

confidence 75%
Ravine / Naturalized Parkalso reads as Destination Park

Classified as Ravine / Naturalized Park: 92% ravine overlap, 24% canopy. Secondary read: Destination Park (54 ha, 9 amenity types, connectivity 79 / comfort 67).

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
0.0 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 9 active uses (transit_stop, retail) and 12 dead/hostile uses (highway, parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
78.7 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 47 mapped paths/walkways and 127 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 52 street intersections within 100 m; 26 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 26 estimated access points across ~6,177 m of perimeter. low edge density, significant superblock penalty applied. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m30
Intersections within 100 m52
Paths/walkways (50 m)47
Sidewalk segments (50 m)127
Transit stops (400 m)26
Estimated entrances26
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter0.49
Park perimeter6,177 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightmeasured 75%
51.8 / 100

9 distinct amenity types in the park (picnic, playground, sports_field, tennis, washroom, bench, …). Diversity, not raw count, drives the score so a park with many distinct activity types can outrank a larger park that repeats the same use.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightmeasured 75%
67.1 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: 24.3% estimated tree canopy; 91.7% inside the ravine system; 2.5% water surface; 122 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (2.3/ha). Reading: ravine-cooled. Source coverage: treed_area, ravine, waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage24.3%
Canopy area13.12 ha
Inside ravine system91.7%
Water surface inside park2.5%
Nearest water (if outside park)0 m (inside)
Estimated green97.5%
City-mapped trees inside polygon122
Tree density2.3 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0 to 100)54.9
Sample points used606

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
59.5 / 100

533 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (7 mid-rise, 526 low-rise, 0 tower); avg edge height 4.7 m (~2 floors); 8.6 buildings per 100 m of 6,177 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges are barely there or single-storey; no towers immediately adjacent. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 7 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m533
Buildings within 50 m533
Avg edge height4.7 m (~2 floors)
Tallest edge building12.6 m
Mid-rise (3 to 7 floors)7
Low-rise (< 3 floors)526
Towers (≥ 13 floors)0
Frontage density8.63 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge1%
Tower share of edge0%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter6,177 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
78.0 risk

Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: Eglinton Avenue West, parking_lot, parking_lot, parking_lot, parking_lot. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" that suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (9 types · 53 records)

  • picnic
  • playground
  • sports field
  • tennis
  • washroom
  • bench
  • pool
  • shelter
  • table tennis

Nearby active-edge features (31)

  • parking lot0 m
  • retail: Tennis Club0 m
  • parking lot0 m
  • parking lot0 m
  • transit stop: Eglinton Avenue West31 m
  • transit stop: 900 The East Mall41 m
  • transit stop: Eglinton Avenue West45 m
  • highway: Eglinton Avenue West46 m
  • parking lot49 m
  • highway: Eglinton Avenue West50 m
  • highway: Eglinton Avenue West54 m
  • highway: Eglinton Avenue West56 m
  • highway: Eglinton Avenue West57 m
  • highway: Eglinton Avenue West60 m
  • transit stop: The East Mall65 m
  • transit stop: The East Mall66 m
  • transit stop: Rathburn Rd at Martin Grove Rd80 m
  • transit stop: Eglinton Avenue East of 427 Highway91 m
  • parking lot93 m
  • transit stop: Rathburn Rd at Martin Grove Rd95 m
  • highway: Eglinton Avenue West100 m
  • highway: Eglinton Avenue West101 m
  • transit stop: 900 The East Mall105 m
  • highway: Eglinton Avenue West168 m
  • highway: Highway 27169 m
  • highway: Highway 427 Collector177 m
  • transit stop: Talgarth Road178 m
  • highway: Highway 427185 m
  • transit stop: 333 Rathburn Road - Walkway to Alanmeade Crescent189 m
  • transit stop: Talgarth Road190 m
  • highway: Highway 27194 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureWest Deane Park
Edge activation, connectivity, amenity diversity, natural comfort, and enclosure, each 0 to 100.

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    85th
  • Edge activation
    31th
  • Connectivity
    98th
  • Amenity diversity
    98th
  • Natural comfort
    83th
  • Enclosure
    38th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Human activity signals: not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of West Deane Parkmatters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all, 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only, no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important
70%

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
  • Mitigate border vacuums (highways, rail, parking) with active programming on the still-permeable edges and treat the hostile edge as a design challenge.

Data sources

real Toronto data
  • City of Toronto Open Data: Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types. Boundaries are reconciled against OpenStreetMap (ODbL) for new and updated parks.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.