Skip to content
Toronto Park Atlas
Thompson Street Parkette — site photograph
Back to map
Urban Plazacluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (enclosure-leaning)South Riverdale (70)confidence moderatereal Toronto data

Thompson Street Parkette

Urban Plaza, one of the city's strongest overall (score 50, rank ~95th percentile). Strongest: edge activation; weakest: natural comfort.

Aerial — City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px source · cached 5/9/2026

Thompson Street Parkette scores 49.9 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and connectivity. Weakest: amenity diversity (11.9). Border-vacuum risk is low. This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors — not a definitive judgment.

Best for:daily passing-throughpocket meetings

Area · 0.14 ha

Vitality Score
50/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 66%

Data Confidence
49.9 / 100
Citywide
95th
of all 3,273 parks
Among Urban Plaza
92nd
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
36
median in pocket Urban Plaza (n=337)
Performance gap
+14
raw − expected · context confidence high
strong overperformer

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Explain this score

Where did the 50 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Amenity Diversity12 · p85
-7.6
Border Vacuum Risk12 (risk)
+3.8
Enclosure / Eyes on Park88 · p94
+3.8
Connectivity62 · p78
+2.4
Natural Comfort38 · p32
-1.8
Edge Activation47 · p95
-0.7

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

Thompson Street Parkette works because its edge activation score (47) is one of the city's strongest and its enclosure (88) is also top decile.

What limits this park

Thompson Street Parkette is held back by natural comfort (38, below-average)— only 0% canopy means little summer shade.

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high edge activation (47, top decile).

Jacobs reading

Thompson Street Parkette sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat — moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.

Performance in context

  • This park is a strong overperformer for its cohort — raw 50 versus an expected 36 for similar parks (pocket Urban Plaza) (gap +14).

Typology classification

confidence 70%
Urban Plaza

Classified as Urban Plaza: 1435 m², paved (0% canopy), 30.8 buildings/100 m

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
47.2 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 41 active uses (restaurant, retail, transit_stop) and 5 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
62.2 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 0 mapped paths/walkways and 23 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 17 street intersections within 100 m; 13 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 0 estimated access points across ~185 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy — no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m14
Intersections within 100 m17
Paths/walkways (50 m)0
Sidewalk segments (50 m)23
Transit stops (400 m)13
Estimated entrances0
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter7.57
Park perimeter185 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightmeasured 75%
11.9 / 100

1 distinct amenity types in the park (dog_area). Diversity, not raw count, drives the score so a park with many distinct activity types can outrank a larger park that repeats the same use.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightinferred 36%
37.7 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: ~2.8% effective canopy (0.0% from contiguous tree polygons + scattered tree density); nearest waterbody ~307 m; 4 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (4.0/ha). Reading: exposed. Source coverage: waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage0.0%
Canopy area0.00 ha
Inside ravine system0.0%
Water surface inside park0.0%
Nearest water (if outside park)307 m
Estimated green100.0%
City-mapped trees inside polygon4
Tree density4.0 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0–100)0.0
Sample points used11

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
87.8 / 100

57 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (18 mid-rise, 39 low-rise, 0 tower); avg edge height 8.1 m (~3 floors); 30.8 buildings per 100 m of 185 m perimeter — strong frontage density; edges are low-rise (mostly 2–3 floors); no towers immediately adjacent. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 18 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m57
Buildings within 50 m57
Avg edge height8.1 m (~3 floors)
Tallest edge building24.7 m
Mid-rise (3–7 floors)18
Low-rise (< 3 floors)39
Towers (≥ 13 floors)0
Frontage density30.81 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge32%
Tower share of edge0%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter185 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
12.0 risk

Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: parking_lot. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" — they suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence — read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (1 types · 1 records)

  • dog area

Nearby active-edge features (80)

  • restaurant — The Broadview Bistro+Bar19 m
  • transit stop — Queen Street East24 m
  • restaurant — Prohibition Gastrohouse29 m
  • restaurant — The Rooftop33 m
  • parking lot37 m
  • retail — Red Label Tattoo39 m
  • restaurant — Eastbound Brewing Company40 m
  • restaurant — Ali Baba's41 m
  • retail — Canna Cabana41 m
  • restaurant — The Civic41 m
  • restaurant — Aura42 m
  • restaurant — Riverside Burgers42 m
  • restaurant — Pizza Nova44 m
  • restaurant — Pizza Pizza44 m
  • restaurant — White Lily Dinner50 m
  • restaurant — Liberty Shawarma51 m
  • parking lot52 m
  • restaurant — Urban House55 m
  • transit stop — Broadview Avenue55 m
  • retail — Riverside Market57 m
  • retail59 m
  • retail61 m
  • restaurant — Pizzaiolo64 m
  • transit stop — Broadview Avenue66 m
  • retail — Better Cleaners69 m
  • retail — Starbank Convenience Mart69 m
  • restaurant — Happy Burger69 m
  • restaurant — The West Cork70 m
  • retail73 m
  • retail73 m
  • retail74 m
  • parking lot74 m
  • retail — Lorne & Co75 m
  • retail — value Buds79 m
  • retail — Naz Treasures.80 m
  • retail — INS Market82 m
  • retail — Stardust Vapes83 m
  • restaurant — Delhiites83 m
  • restaurant — Issander85 m
  • retail — Fevers Vintage90 m
  • retail — Diana90 m
  • parking lot95 m
  • retail — Second Voyage96 m
  • restaurant — Subway96 m
  • parking lot97 m
  • transit stop — Carroll Street99 m
  • restaurant — Burrito Queen100 m
  • restaurant — Est101 m
  • retail — Fortune Smoke & Gifts Store104 m
  • retail — St John's Bakery105 m
  • restaurant — Real Greek Gyros105 m
  • retail — Butchers of Distinction109 m
  • retail — St john's Eco Market114 m
  • retail — Little Peeps119 m
  • retail119 m
  • retail — Kalamkaar121 m
  • retail — Ride Away Bikes126 m
  • cafe — ALK130 m
  • restaurant — Wendy's133 m
  • cafe — Dark Horse Espresso Bar138 m
  • retail — Stephan Caras141 m
  • restaurant — Slayer Burger142 m
  • parking lot144 m
  • retail — East Toronto Foot Care144 m
  • parking lot144 m
  • retail — Amavi Atelier145 m
  • retail146 m
  • retail — Broadview Beauty Parlour/George's Barbershop147 m
  • retail — Downtown Toyota Pre-owned149 m
  • retail — The Cannonball150 m
  • retail — Hair Code152 m
  • transit stop — Carroll Street152 m
  • retail — Album Hair154 m
  • restaurant — COPS154 m
  • cafe — Isle of Coffee156 m
  • retail156 m
  • retail — Clinique de Mode160 m
  • retail — Blackbird Bakery162 m
  • retail — Core Realty162 m
  • retail164 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureThompson Street Parkette

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    95th
  • Edge activation
    95th
  • Connectivity
    78th
  • Amenity diversity
    85th
  • Natural comfort
    32th
  • Enclosure
    94th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space — useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Human activity signals — not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of Thompson Street Parkettematters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter — and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all · 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only — no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions — a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park — playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden — even small additions raise this score.
  • Increase canopy and reduce paved area. Shade and water features extend usable hours and seasons.

Data sources

  • City of Toronto Open Data — Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.